I have spent enough time in organisations to see very well-prepared conversations change almost nothing.
The manager knew what they wanted to say. They had the arguments. They had examples. Sometimes they even had the presentation.
At the end, everyone left the room almost exactly where they had entered it.
Not because people had failed to understand the message. The problem was that the message was not the problem.
We enter the conversation too quickly
When a problem appears, the natural reflex is to solve it.
A colleague is not delivering. A team member avoids responsibility. Two departments are blocking each other. A difficult piece of feedback keeps being postponed.
So we start preparing the conversation: “How do I say it?”
There may be a more useful question: “What do I want to be different after this conversation?”
It sounds like a small distinction. It is not.
If my objective is only to say what bothers me, the conversation will look one way. If the objective is for two people to work better together, it will probably look different.
If I want ownership but conduct the conversation in a way that keeps the other person defending themselves, my method may produce the opposite of the result I want.
The visible conversation and the real conversation
Sometimes we talk about deadlines when the real issue is trust.
We talk about performance when roles are unclear.
We talk about one person's behaviour while avoiding a management decision that has already been postponed for months.
This is where conversations become interesting. We can become very good at discussing the wrong problem, and we can do it very professionally.
Clarity is not only knowing what you want to say. It is understanding what is actually happening.
When you enter to be right
Sometimes we enter a difficult conversation telling ourselves that we want dialogue when what we really want is confirmation of a conclusion we have already reached.
We ask questions, but only until we hear the answer we expected. We listen while preparing the next argument.
We say “I want to understand” while looking for the moment when we can explain why the other person sees things incorrectly.
It is not necessarily bad intent. It is very human.
A conversation in which the verdict exists before the conversation begins does not look much like a conversation.
From idea to practice
Want to put the idea into practice?
Work on difficult conversations in executive coachingQuestions change the quality of the information
Many management roles come with pressure to have the answers. Perhaps that is exactly why questions can be so valuable.
“How do you see the situation?” “What am I missing?” “What is getting in your way?” “What have you already tried?” “What would a better-working version look like for you?”
Not because questions are an elegant leadership technique, but because good decisions depend on good information.
Sometimes the answer confirms what we thought. Sometimes it changes the problem completely.
A good conversation is not necessarily comfortable
There is an opposite temptation: to assume a good conversation is one in which nobody feels uncomfortable.
I do not think so.
Some important things are uncomfortable. A missed standard may call for a conversation. A responsibility may need clarification. Sometimes the answer is “no”. Sometimes a decision will not please everyone.
The quality of the conversation is not the absence of tension. It is the ability to work with tension without losing sight of the problem, the person and what we want to build next.
What remains after the conversation?
For me, this is one of the simplest tests.
After the conversation: is the situation clearer? Do we know who does what? Is there a choice or a next step? Has anything changed in how the two people understand the situation? Or did we simply talk?
Not every conversation produces an immediate solution. An important one can still leave more clarity behind than existed before.
If you notice that you keep returning to the same conversations, perhaps the problem is not the wording. It may be worth looking at what happens before them.
For managers and leaders who want a space to work with these situations, executive coaching for managers can be one of those contexts.
Sometimes the conversation that changes things is not the one with perfect wording. It is the one in which you understood more clearly what conversation you were actually having.
Working with a similar situation?
Start a conversation